Koch Media España SLU, parte de Koch Media productor y distribuidor líder de productos de entretenimiento digital, ha anunciado la incorporación de seis nuevas producciones al sello MegaHits, que engloba las reediciones bajo un nuevo formato de grandes clásicos para PC. Se trata de seis recopilatorios de la firma Square Enix de franquicias de reconocido prestigio de acción y estrategia, a saber, Tomb Raider, Deus Ex, Hitman, Thief, Just Cause y BattleStations, que se lanzarán el próximo 4 de diciembre de 2013.

Hitman Trilogy, que incluye tres entregas del asesino silencioso más famoso del mundo del entretenimiento, y Tomb Raider Quadrilogy, con el cuarteto de las mejores aventuras de la aguerrida explorada Lara Croft, suponen una ocasión imprescindible para sumergirse en dos sagas icónicas en el mundo de los videojuegos. A la espera del lanzamiento del nuevo capítulo, Thief Triple Pack permitirá a los jugadores sumergirse de lleno en la franquicia del sigilo y la infiltración por excelencia.

El pack doble de la franquicia Just Cause, que engloba a las dos entregas editadas hasta la fecha, supone todo un homenaje al tan de moda en la actualidad género sandbox. Por su parte los dos primeros capítulos de la saga Deus Ex permitirán adentrarse en los orígenes de una saga en la que se entremezclan a la perfección el género de la ciencia ficción, el rol y la cultura ciberpunk. Por último, el BattleStations Bundle permitirá a los usuarios recrear algunas de las batallas más emblemáticas de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, como las de Pearl Harbour y Midway, en el frente del Pacífico.

12 Comentarios

  1. Throughout the great scheme of things you receive an A just for effort and hard work. Where you lost me personally ended up being on your particulars. As they say, details make or break the argument.. And it could not be much more true in this article. Having said that, allow me reveal to you what exactly did give good results. The text can be rather convincing which is possibly the reason why I am taking an effort to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Next, even though I can easily see the leaps in logic you make, I am not necessarily convinced of just how you seem to connect your ideas which in turn help to make the actual final result. For right now I will subscribe to your position however wish in the foreseeable future you link the dots much better.

  2. Virtually all of the things you assert is supprisingly accurate and it makes me ponder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light before. Your piece really did switch the light on for me personally as far as this specific subject matter goes. But at this time there is actually one factor I am not necessarily too comfy with so whilst I attempt to reconcile that with the central theme of your issue, let me observe what all the rest of the subscribers have to say.Nicely done.

  3. Generally I don’t read article on blogs, but I would like to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do it! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thanks, very nice post.

  4. I must show appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from this problem. After checking throughout the world-wide-web and meeting notions which are not productive, I thought my life was well over. Being alive minus the answers to the problems you have resolved by way of your main short article is a serious case, as well as those which could have negatively affected my career if I had not encountered your blog. Your mastery and kindness in controlling all the pieces was excellent. I’m not sure what I would have done if I had not discovered such a stuff like this. I can also at this point look ahead to my future. Thank you so much for the reliable and result oriented guide. I won’t be reluctant to suggest your web page to any individual who needs and wants care about this topic.

    • Cela me rappelle les chouineries des ministres et secrétaires d’état, quand on leur a dit qu’ils devraient réduire leur nombre de conseillers (je suis d’ailleurs sceptique sur la réalisation de cet objectif)Lagarde, par exemple, expliquait qu’elle ne pouvait pas faire sans son équipe actuelle au complet. Mais bien évidemment, si un commissaire de police tente d’argumenter, d’expliquer qu’avec moins de flics il y aura forcément moins de patrouilles, si un proviseur tente de dire qu’avec moins de surveillants la discipline sera moins respectée, si un directeur d’hôpital explique qu’avec moins d’infirmières les malades recevront forcément moins d’attention, ce n’est pas recevable.Cherchez l’erreur

  5. I would like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this site. I am hoping the same high-grade site post from you in the upcoming also. In fact your creative writing skills has encouraged me to get my own site now. Actually the blogging is spreading its wings quickly. Your write up is a great example of it.

Dejar respuesta