Publicado por Editorial Dolmen, ya estamos inmersos en el nuevo libro de la Colección Stoker Cabeza De Ciervo, escrito por Francisco Miguel Espinosa. En unos días tendréis la reseña, pero ya os avisamos que el libro nos esta encantando.

cabeza de ciervo

Un cadáver. Un pequeño pueblo del Sur Americano. Dos fémures y una cabeza. Un puñado de preguntas. 

Abismo es un pueblo tranquilo, con sus viejas historias y sus rencores sepultados bajo toneladas de miradas furtivas, años de silencio y falsas sonrisas. Hasta que el sheriff aparece asesinado: sin cabeza y sin fémures. Alguien del apacible Abismo se está dedicando a salir con la luna llena ataviado con una cornamenta hecha de huesos humanos y aterrorizar a los habitantes del fin del mundo. Bob, el ayudante del sheriff a tiempo parcial y borracho del pueblo a tiempo completo, tendrá que resolver el enigma de su vida y encontrar al monstruo antes de que se cobre su próxima víctima. 

“Cabeza de Ciervo no es una novela. Es una patada en la boca. Francisco Miguel Espinosa es de esos autores que no puedo ni ver. Simplemente su talento me da envidia.” –Juan de Dios Garduño. 

“Leer este libro es como despertarse desnudo y borracho en una morgue.” –Emilio Bueso

Quieres más? No te pierdas nuestro análisis a Chelston House de Laura Falco Lara dentro de la colección Stoker

Te gusta el terror? Tenemos muchas reseñas de libros , cine y comics.

6 Comentarios

  1. Throughout this awesome scheme of things you’ll get an A+ just for effort. Exactly where you confused me personally was first on your facts. You know, they say, the devil is in the details… And that couldn’t be much more correct at this point. Having said that, let me reveal to you exactly what did deliver the results. The article (parts of it) is certainly really engaging which is possibly why I am taking the effort in order to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. Secondly, while I can certainly see a leaps in reasoning you come up with, I am not necessarily convinced of how you appear to unite the details that produce the final result. For right now I shall subscribe to your position however hope in the future you connect the dots much better.

  2. The very core of your writing whilst appearing agreeable originally, did not work very well with me personally after some time. Somewhere throughout the sentences you were able to make me a believer but just for a very short while. I still have a problem with your leaps in logic and you would do nicely to help fill in all those gaps. In the event you can accomplish that, I would definitely be impressed.

  3. A large percentage of of whatever you state happens to be astonishingly accurate and it makes me ponder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light before. This particular piece really did switch the light on for me as far as this specific issue goes. However at this time there is actually just one position I am not necessarily too cozy with so while I try to reconcile that with the actual main idea of your position, permit me observe exactly what the rest of the visitors have to say.Well done.

  4. Throughout this awesome design of things you’ll receive an A just for effort and hard work. Exactly where you actually confused me personally was first in the specifics. You know, they say, details make or break the argument.. And it couldn’t be more correct at this point. Having said that, allow me say to you what did work. Your article (parts of it) is certainly quite convincing which is possibly the reason why I am making the effort to opine. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, while I can certainly see the jumps in reasoning you make, I am not really certain of how you seem to unite the points that make the final result. For the moment I will yield to your issue but wish in the foreseeable future you actually link your dots better.

  5. It is actually nearly unthinkable to come across well-advised parties on this issue, however , you seem like you are familiar with the things that you’re writing about! With Thanks

Dejar respuesta